Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro K4200 vs NVIDIA Tesla K20Xm

NVIDIA Quadro K4200 vs NVIDIA Tesla K20Xm

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Quadro K4200 and 6GB VRAM Tesla K20Xm to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro K4200 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 8 months late
Boost Clock784MHz
Lower TDP (108W vs 235W)
NVIDIA Tesla K20Xm 's Advantages
More VRAM (6GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (249.6GB/s vs 172.8GB/s)
1344 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro K4200
2.107 TFLOPS
Tesla K20Xm +86%
3.935 TFLOPS
Blender
Quadro K4200
176
Tesla K20Xm +111%
372
OctaneBench
Quadro K4200
32
Tesla K20Xm +96%
63
VS

Graphics Card

Jul 2014
Release Date
Nov 2012
Quadro
Generation
Tesla
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

771 MHz
Base Clock
-
784 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1350 MHz
Memory Clock
1300 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
6GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
384bit
172.8GB/s
Bandwidth
249.6GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
-
1344
Shading Units
2688
112
TMUs
224
32
ROPs
48
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
512 KB
L2 Cache
1536 KB

Theoretical Performance

21.95 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
40.99 GPixel/s
87.81 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
164.0 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
2.107 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.935 TFLOPS
87.81 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
1312 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GK104
GPU Name
GK110
GK104-850-A2
GPU Variant
-
Kepler
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
3.54 billion
Transistors
7.08 billion
294 mm²
Die Size
561 mm²

Board Design

108W
TDP
235W
300 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.1
Vulkan
1.1
3.0
CUDA
3.5
5.1
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy