Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro K4200 vs NVIDIA Quadro 6000

NVIDIA Quadro K4200 vs NVIDIA Quadro 6000

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Quadro K4200 and 6GB VRAM Quadro 6000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro K4200 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock784MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (172.8GB/s vs 143.4GB/s)
896 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (108W vs 204W)
NVIDIA Quadro 6000 's Advantages
More VRAM (6GB vs 4GB)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro K4200 +104%
2.107 TFLOPS
Quadro 6000
1.028 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jul 2014
Release Date
Dec 2010
Quadro
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

771 MHz
Base Clock
-
784 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1350 MHz
Memory Clock
747 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
6GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
384bit
172.8GB/s
Bandwidth
143.4GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
14
-
Compute Units
-
1344
Shading Units
448
112
TMUs
56
32
ROPs
48
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
512 KB
L2 Cache
768 KB

Theoretical Performance

21.95 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
16.07 GPixel/s
87.81 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
32.14 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
2.107 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1028 GFLOPS
87.81 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
513.9 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GK104
GPU Name
GF100
GK104-850-A2
GPU Variant
GF100-850-A3
Kepler
Architecture
Fermi
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
40 nm
3.54 billion
Transistors
3.1 billion
294 mm²
Die Size
529 mm²

Board Design

108W
TDP
204W
300 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1x S-Video
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.1
Vulkan
N/A
3.0
CUDA
2.0
5.1
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy