Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro K2000 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 3 GB

NVIDIA Quadro K2000 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 3 GB

We compared a Professional market GPU: 2GB VRAM Quadro K2000 and a Desktop platform GPU: 3GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1050 3 GB to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro K2000 's Advantages
Lower TDP (51W vs 75W)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 3 GB 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock1518MHz
More VRAM (3GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (84.10GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
384 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro K2000
0.733 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 1050 3 GB +218%
2.332 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2013
Release Date
May 2018
Quadro
Generation
GeForce 10
Professional
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1392 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1518 MHz
1000 MHz
Memory Clock
1752 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
3GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
96bit
64.00GB/s
Bandwidth
84.10GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
6
-
Compute Units
-
384
Shading Units
768
32
TMUs
48
16
ROPs
24
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SM)
256 KB
L2 Cache
768 KB

Theoretical Performance

7.632 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
36.43 GPixel/s
30.53 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
72.86 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
36.43 GFLOPS
732.7 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.332 TFLOPS
30.53 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
72.86 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GK107
GPU Name
GP107
GK107-301-A2
GPU Variant
GP107-301-K1-A1
Kepler
Architecture
Pascal
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
28 nm
Process Size
14 nm
1.27 billion
Transistors
3.3 billion
118 mm²
Die Size
132 mm²

Board Design

51W
TDP
75W
250 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x DVI 1x HDMI 2.0 1x DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.1
Vulkan
1.3
3.0
CUDA
6.1
5.1
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy