Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GRID K200 vs NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000

NVIDIA GRID K200 vs NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 256MB VRAM GRID K200 and 16GB VRAM Quadro RTX 5000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GRID K200 's Advantages
Lower TDP (225W vs 230W)
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock1815MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (448.0GB/s vs 160.0GB/s)
1536 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GRID K200
2.289 TFLOPS
Quadro RTX 5000 +387%
11.15 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2013
Release Date
Aug 2018
GRID
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1620 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1815 MHz
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz

Memory

256MB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
160.0GB/s
Bandwidth
448.0GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
48
-
Compute Units
-
1536
Shading Units
3072
128
TMUs
192
32
ROPs
64
-
Tensor Cores
384
-
RT Cores
48
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
512 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB

Theoretical Performance

23.84 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
116.2 GPixel/s
95.36 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
348.5 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
22.30 TFLOPS
2.289 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
11.15 TFLOPS
95.36 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
348.5 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GK104
GPU Name
TU104
-
GPU Variant
TU104-875-A1
Kepler
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
12 nm
3.54 billion
Transistors
13.6 billion
294 mm²
Die Size
545 mm²

Board Design

225W
TDP
230W
550 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
No outputs
Outputs
4x DisplayPort 1.4a 1x USB Type-C
-
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.1
Vulkan
1.3
3.0
CUDA
7.5
5.1
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy