Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 vs NVIDIA CMP 100HX-210

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 vs NVIDIA CMP 100HX-210

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1650 and 16GB VRAM CMP 100HX 210 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 45% (1665MHz vs 1147MHz)
Lower TDP (75W vs 250W)
NVIDIA CMP 100HX-210 's Advantages
Released 9 months late
More VRAM (16GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (829.4GB/s vs 128.1GB/s)
4224 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 1650
2.984 TFLOPS
CMP 100HX 210 +293%
11.75 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Apr 2019
Release Date
Jan 2020
GeForce 16
Generation
Mining GPUs
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1485 MHz
Base Clock
555 MHz
1665 MHz
Boost Clock
1147 MHz
2001 MHz
Memory Clock
810 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
HBM2
128bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
128.1GB/s
Bandwidth
829.4GB/s

Render Config

14
SM Count
80
-
Compute Units
-
896
Shading Units
5120
56
TMUs
320
32
ROPs
128
-
Tensor Cores
640
-
RT Cores
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
96 KB (per SM)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
6 MB

Theoretical Performance

53.28 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
146.8 GPixel/s
93.24 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
367.0 GTexel/s
5.967 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
23.49 TFLOPS
2.984 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
11.75 TFLOPS
93.24 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
5.873 TFLOPS

Graphics Processor

TU117
GPU Name
GV100
TU117-300-A1
GPU Variant
-
Turing
Architecture
Volta
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
12 nm
4.7 billion
Transistors
21.1 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
815 mm²

Board Design

75W
TDP
250W
250 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
1x DVI 1x HDMI 2.0 1x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
7.5
CUDA
7.0
6.6
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy