Home GPU Comparison AMD FireStream 9270 vs 3dfx Voodoo4-2 4200 PCI 16 MB

AMD FireStream 9270 vs 3dfx Voodoo4-2 4200 PCI 16 MB

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM FireStream 9270 and 16MB VRAM Voodoo4 2 4200 PCI 16 MB to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FireStream 9270 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (115.2GB/s vs 2.656GB/s)
800 additional rendering cores
3dfx Voodoo4-2 4200 PCI 16 MB 's Advantages
Lower TDP (15W vs 160W)

Score

VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2008
Release Date
Unknown
FireStream
Generation
Voodoo4-2
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
AGP 4x

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
900 MHz
Memory Clock
166 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
16MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
DDR
256bit
Memory Bus
64bit
115.2GB/s
Bandwidth
2.656GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
10
Compute Units
-
800
Shading Units
-
40
TMUs
2
16
ROPs
2
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
256 KB
L2 Cache
-

Theoretical Performance

12.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
332.0 MPixel/s
30.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
332.0 MTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
1200 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
-
240.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Graphics Processor

RV770
GPU Name
VSA-101
RV770 XT
GPU Variant
Daytona (355-0025-221)
TeraScale
Architecture
Voodoo Scalable
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
180 nm
0.956 billion
Transistors
0.014 billion
256 mm²
Die Size
112 mm²

Board Design

160W
TDP
15W
450 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x DVI
Outputs
1x DVI 1x VGA
2x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

10.1 (10_1)
DirectX
6.0
3.3
OpenGL
1.1
1.1
OpenCL
N/A
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
-
4.1
Shader Model
-

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy