Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro W6150M vs ATI Radeon E4690 MXM

AMD FirePro W6150M vs ATI Radeon E4690 MXM

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM FirePro W6150M and 512MB VRAM Radeon E4690 MXM to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro W6150M 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 5 months late
Larger VRAM bandwidth (88.00GB/s vs 22.40GB/s)
448 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro W6150M +329%
1.651 TFLOPS
Radeon E4690 MXM
0.384 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2015
Release Date
Jun 2009
FirePro Mobile
Generation
Embedded
Mobile
Type
Mobile
MXM-B (3.0)
Bus Interface
MXM-II

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
1375 MHz
Memory Clock
700 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
88.00GB/s
Bandwidth
22.40GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
12
Compute Units
4
768
Shading Units
320
48
TMUs
32
16
ROPs
8
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
256 KB
L2 Cache
128 KB

Theoretical Performance

17.20 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
4.800 GPixel/s
51.60 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
19.20 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
1.651 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
384.0 GFLOPS
103.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Graphics Processor

Emerald
GPU Name
RV730
Emerald XT GL (216-0857001)
GPU Variant
RV730 XT E4690 (215-0729055)
GCN 2.0
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
55 nm
2.08 billion
Transistors
0.514 billion
160 mm²
Die Size
146 mm²

Board Design

Unknown
TDP
30W
-
Suggested PSU
-
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
10.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
2.1
OpenCL
1.1
1.2.170
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
-
6.5
Shader Model
4.1

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy