Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro M8900 vs NVIDIA NVS 5100M

AMD FirePro M8900 vs NVIDIA NVS 5100M

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM FirePro M8900 and 1024MB VRAM NVS 5100M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro M8900 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 3 months late
More VRAM (2GB vs 1GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (115.2GB/s vs 25.60GB/s)
912 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA NVS 5100M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (35W vs 75W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro M8900 +1025%
1.306 TFLOPS
NVS 5100M
0.116 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Apr 2011
Release Date
Jan 2010
FirePro Mobile
Generation
NVS Mobile
Mobile
Type
Mobile
MXM-B (3.0)
Bus Interface
MXM-A (3.0)

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
900 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
115.2GB/s
Bandwidth
25.60GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
6
12
Compute Units
-
960
Shading Units
48
48
TMUs
16
32
ROPs
8
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
8 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
512 KB
L2 Cache
64 KB

Theoretical Performance

21.76 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
4.400 GPixel/s
32.64 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
8.800 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
1306 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
116.2 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
-

Graphics Processor

Blackcomb
GPU Name
GT216
Blackcomb XT GL
GPU Variant
N10P-NS
TeraScale 2
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
40 nm
1.7 billion
Transistors
0.486 billion
212 mm²
Die Size
100 mm²

Board Design

75W
TDP
35W
-
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Features

11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_1)
4.4
OpenGL
3.3
1.2
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.2
5.0
Shader Model
4.1

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy