Home GPU Comparison Intel Arc A370M vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Max Q

Intel Arc A370M vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Max Q

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Arc A370M and 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1650 Max Q to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Intel Arc A370M 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 11 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 38% (1550MHz vs 1125MHz)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Max Q 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (160.0GB/s vs 112.0GB/s)
Lower TDP (30W vs 35W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Arc A370M +37%
3.174 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 1650 Max Q
2.304 TFLOPS
3DMark Time Spy
Arc A370M +16%
3428
GeForce GTX 1650 Max Q
2953
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2022
Release Date
Apr 2020
Alchemist
Generation
GeForce 16 Mobile
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

300 MHz
Base Clock
930 MHz
1550 MHz
Boost Clock
1125 MHz
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR6
64bit
Memory Bus
128bit
112.0GB/s
Bandwidth
160.0GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
16
-
Compute Units
-
1024
Shading Units
1024
64
TMUs
64
32
ROPs
32
-
Tensor Cores
-
8
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
4 MB
L2 Cache
1024 KB

Theoretical Performance

49.60 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
36.00 GPixel/s
99.20 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
72.00 GTexel/s
6.349 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
4.608 TFLOPS
3.174 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.304 TFLOPS
793.6 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
72.00 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

DG2-128
GPU Name
TU117
ACM-G11
GPU Variant
N18P-G61-MP2
Generation 12.7
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
6 nm
Process Size
12 nm
7.2 billion
Transistors
4.7 billion
157 mm²
Die Size
200 mm²

Board Design

35W
TDP
30W
-
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
7.5
6.6
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy