Home GPU Comparison AMD Instinct MI300X vs NVIDIA Quadro K2200

AMD Instinct MI300X vs NVIDIA Quadro K2200

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 192GB VRAM AMD Instinct MI300X and 4GB VRAM Quadro K2200 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Instinct MI300X 's Advantages
Released 9 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 87% (2100MHz vs 1124MHz)
More VRAM (192GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (5300GB/s vs 80.19GB/s)
18816 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro K2200 's Advantages
Lower TDP (68W vs 750W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
AMD Instinct MI300X +11255%
163.4 TFLOPS
Quadro K2200
1.439 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Dec 2023
Release Date
Jul 2014
Instinct
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 5.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1000 MHz
Base Clock
1046 MHz
2100 MHz
Boost Clock
1124 MHz
5200 MHz
Memory Clock
1253 MHz

Memory

192GB
Memory Size
4GB
HBM3
Memory Type
GDDR5
8192bit
Memory Bus
128bit
5300GB/s
Bandwidth
80.19GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
304
Compute Units
-
19456
Shading Units
640
880
TMUs
40
0
ROPs
16
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SMM)
16 MB
L2 Cache
2 MB

Theoretical Performance

0 MPixel/s
Pixel Rate
17.98 GPixel/s
1496 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
44.96 GTexel/s
1300 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
163.4 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1439 GFLOPS
81.7 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
44.96 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

MI300
GPU Name
GM107
-
GPU Variant
-
CDNA 3.0
Architecture
Maxwell
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
28 nm
146 billion
Transistors
1.87 billion
1017 mm²
Die Size
148 mm²

Board Design

750W
TDP
68W
1000 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

N/A
DirectX
12 (11_0)
N/A
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
5.0
N/A
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy