Home GPU Comparison H200 SXM vs AMD Instinct MI300X

H200 SXM vs AMD Instinct MI300X

AI GPU We compared a GPU: 141GB VRAM H200 SXM and a Professional market GPU: 192GB VRAM AMD Instinct MI300X to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

H200 SXM 's Advantages
Lower TDP (700W vs 750W)
AMD Instinct MI300X 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 6% (2100MHz vs 1980MHz)
More VRAM (192GB vs 141GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (5300GB/s vs 4800GB/s)
2560 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
H200 SXM
67 TFLOPS
AMD Instinct MI300X +143%
163.4 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2023
Release Date
Dec 2023
Hopper
Generation
Instinct
AI GPU
Type
Professional
PCIe 5.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 5.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1590 MHz
Base Clock
1000 MHz
1980 MHz
Boost Clock
2100 MHz
1313 MHz
Memory Clock
5200 MHz

Memory

141GB
Memory Size
192GB
HBM3e
Memory Type
HBM3
5120bit
Memory Bus
8192bit
4800GB/s
Bandwidth
5300GB/s

Render Config

132
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
304
16896
Shading Units
19456
528
TMUs
880
24
ROPs
0
528
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
256 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
50 MB
L2 Cache
16 MB

Theoretical Performance

47.52 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
0 MPixel/s
1045 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
1496 GTexel/s
1979 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
1300 TFLOPS
67 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
163.4 TFLOPS
34 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
81.7 TFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GH200
GPU Name
MI300
-
GPU Variant
-
Hopper
Architecture
CDNA 3.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
4 nm
Process Size
5 nm
80 billion
Transistors
146 billion
814 mm²
Die Size
1017 mm²

Board Design

700W
TDP
750W
1100 W
Suggested PSU
1000 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
8-pin EPS
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

N/A
DirectX
N/A
N/A
OpenGL
N/A
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
9.0
CUDA
-
N/A
Shader Model
N/A

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy