Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA A800 PCIe 80 GB vs Intel Arctic Sound-M

NVIDIA A800 PCIe 80 GB vs Intel Arctic Sound-M

AI GPU We compared a GPU: 80GB VRAM A800 PCIe 80 GB and a Professional market GPU: 16GB VRAM Arctic Sound M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA A800 PCIe 80 GB 's Advantages
Released 10 months late
Boost Clock1410MHz
More VRAM (80GB vs 16GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (2039GB/s vs 1229GB/s)
Lower TDP (250W vs 500W)
Intel Arctic Sound-M 's Advantages
1280 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
A800 PCIe 80 GB +32%
19.49 TFLOPS
Arctic Sound M
14.75 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2022
Release Date
Jan 2022
Ampere
Generation
Data Center GPU
AI GPU
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1065 MHz
Base Clock
-
1410 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1593 MHz
Memory Clock
1200 MHz

Memory

80GB
Memory Size
16GB
HBM2e
Memory Type
HBM2e
5120bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
2039GB/s
Bandwidth
1229GB/s

Render Config

108
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
-
6912
Shading Units
8192
432
TMUs
256
160
ROPs
128
432
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
192 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
80 MB
L2 Cache
8 MB

Theoretical Performance

225.6 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
115.2 GPixel/s
609.1 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
230.4 GTexel/s
77.97 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
29.49 TFLOPS
19.49 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
14.75 TFLOPS
9.746 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
3.686 TFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GA100
GPU Name
Arctic Sound
-
GPU Variant
-
Ampere
Architecture
Generation 12.5
TSMC
Foundry
Intel
7 nm
Process Size
10 nm
54.2 billion
Transistors
8 billion
826 mm²
Die Size
190 mm²

Board Design

250W
TDP
500W
600 W
Suggested PSU
900 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
8-pin EPS
Power Connectors
8-pin EPS

Graphics Features

N/A
DirectX
12 (12_1)
N/A
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
8.0
CUDA
-
N/A
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy