Home
Mobile and Tablet SoC Comparison
RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation vs RTX 4000 Mobile Ada Generation
RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation vs RTX 4000 Mobile Ada Generation
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation and 12GB VRAM RTX 4000 Mobile Ada Generation to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 21% (2010MHz vs 1665MHz)
Lower TDP (50W vs 110W)
RTX 4000 Mobile Ada Generation Advantages
More VRAM (12GB vs 8GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (432.0GB/s vs 256.0GB/s)
4352 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation
12350
RTX 4000 Mobile Ada Generation
+100%
24720
Graphics Card
Mar 2023
Release Date
Mar 2023
Quadro Ada-M
Generation
Quadro Ada-M
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1530 MHz
Base Clock
1290 MHz
2010 MHz
Boost Clock
1665 MHz
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
2250 MHz
Memory
8GB
Memory Size
12GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
192bit
256.0GB/s
Bandwidth
432.0GB/s
Render Config
24
SM Count
58
3072
Shading Units
7424
96
TMUs
232
48
ROPs
80
96
Tensor Cores
232
24
RT Cores
58
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
12 MB
L2 Cache
48 MB
Theoretical Performance
96.48 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
133.2 GPixel/s
193.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
386.3 GTexel/s
12.35 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
24.72 TFLOPS
12.35 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
24.72 TFLOPS
193.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
386.3 GFLOPS
Board Design
50W
TDP
110W
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
AD107
GPU Name
AD104
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
5 nm
18.9 billion
Transistors
35.8 billion
159 mm²
Die Size
294 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
8.9
CUDA
8.9
6.7
Shader Model
6.7
