Home Mobile and Tablet SoC Comparison RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation vs P106M

RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation vs P106M

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation and 4GB VRAM P106M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation Advantages
Released 4 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 56% (2010MHz vs 1291MHz)
More VRAM (8GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (256.0GB/s vs 96.13GB/s)
1920 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (50W vs 75W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation +315%
12350
P106M
2974

Graphics Card

Mar 2023
Release Date
Jan 2019
Quadro Ada-M
Generation
Mining GPUs
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1530 MHz
Base Clock
1291 MHz
2010 MHz
Boost Clock
1291 MHz
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
1502 MHz

Memory

8GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
256.0GB/s
Bandwidth
96.13GB/s

Render Config

24
SM Count
9
3072
Shading Units
1152
96
TMUs
72
48
ROPs
32
96
Tensor Cores
-
24
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SM)
12 MB
L2 Cache
1280 KB

Theoretical Performance

96.48 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
41.31 GPixel/s
193.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
92.95 GTexel/s
12.35 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
46.48 GFLOPS
12.35 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.974 TFLOPS
193.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
92.95 GFLOPS

Board Design

50W
TDP
75W
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

AD107
GPU Name
GP106
-
GPU Variant
GP106-505-KC-A1
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
Pascal
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
16 nm
18.9 billion
Transistors
4.4 billion
159 mm²
Die Size
200 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
8.9
CUDA
6.1
6.7
Shader Model
6.8
© 2025 - TopCPU.net