Home
Mobile and Tablet SoC Comparison
RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation vs RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation X2
RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation vs RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation X2
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation and 16GB VRAM RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation X2 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 20% (2010MHz vs 1680MHz)
Lower TDP (50W vs 150W)
RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation X2 Advantages
More VRAM (16GB vs 8GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (576.0GB/s vs 256.0GB/s)
6656 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation
12350
RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation X2
+164%
32690
Graphics Card
Mar 2023
Release Date
Mar 2023
Quadro Ada-M
Generation
Quadro Ada-M
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1530 MHz
Base Clock
930 MHz
2010 MHz
Boost Clock
1680 MHz
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
2250 MHz
Memory
8GB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
256.0GB/s
Bandwidth
576.0GB/s
Render Config
24
SM Count
76
3072
Shading Units
9728
96
TMUs
304
48
ROPs
112
96
Tensor Cores
304
24
RT Cores
76
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
12 MB
L2 Cache
64 MB
Theoretical Performance
96.48 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
188.2 GPixel/s
193.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
510.7 GTexel/s
12.35 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
32.69 TFLOPS
12.35 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
32.69 TFLOPS
193.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
510.7 GFLOPS
Board Design
50W
TDP
150W
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
AD107
GPU Name
AD103
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
5 nm
18.9 billion
Transistors
45.9 billion
159 mm²
Die Size
379 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
8.9
CUDA
8.9
6.7
Shader Model
6.8
