RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation vs Radeon R5 A330
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation and 2GB VRAM Radeon R5 A330 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation Advantages
Released 7 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock2010MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (256.0GB/s vs 14.40GB/s)
2752 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation
+1774%
12350
Radeon R5 A330
659
Graphics Card
Mar 2023
Release Date
Oct 2015
Quadro Ada-M
Generation
All-In-One
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x8
Clock Speeds
1530 MHz
Base Clock
-
2010 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz
Memory
8GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
DDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
64bit
256.0GB/s
Bandwidth
14.40GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
5
24
SM Count
-
3072
Shading Units
320
96
TMUs
20
48
ROPs
8
96
Tensor Cores
-
24
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
12 MB
L2 Cache
128 KB
Theoretical Performance
96.48 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
8.240 GPixel/s
193.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
20.60 GTexel/s
12.35 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
12.35 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
659.2 GFLOPS
193.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
50W
TDP
Unknown
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
AD107
GPU Name
Exo
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
28 nm
18.9 billion
Transistors
0.69 billion
159 mm²
Die Size
56 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
2.1 (1.2)
1.3
Vulkan
1.2.170
8.9
CUDA
-
6.7
Shader Model
6.5 (5.1)