Home
Mobile and Tablet SoC Comparison
RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation vs RTX 1000 Mobile Ada Generation
RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation vs RTX 1000 Mobile Ada Generation
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation and 6GB VRAM RTX 1000 Mobile Ada Generation to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation Advantages
More VRAM (8GB vs 6GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (256.0GB/s vs 192.0GB/s)
512 additional rendering cores
RTX 1000 Mobile Ada Generation Advantages
Released 11 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 1% (2025MHz vs 2010MHz)
Lower TDP (35W vs 50W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation
+19%
12350
RTX 1000 Mobile Ada Generation
10370
Graphics Card
Mar 2023
Release Date
Feb 2024
Quadro Ada-M
Generation
Quadro Ada-M
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8
Clock Speeds
1530 MHz
Base Clock
1485 MHz
2010 MHz
Boost Clock
2025 MHz
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz
Memory
8GB
Memory Size
6GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
96bit
256.0GB/s
Bandwidth
192.0GB/s
Render Config
24
SM Count
20
3072
Shading Units
2560
96
TMUs
80
48
ROPs
48
96
Tensor Cores
80
24
RT Cores
20
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
12 MB
L2 Cache
12 MB
Theoretical Performance
96.48 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
97.20 GPixel/s
193.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
162.0 GTexel/s
12.35 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
10.37 TFLOPS
12.35 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
10.37 TFLOPS
193.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
162.0 GFLOPS
Board Design
50W
TDP
35W
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
AD107
GPU Name
AD107
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
5 nm
18.9 billion
Transistors
18.9 billion
159 mm²
Die Size
159 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
8.9
CUDA
8.9
6.7
Shader Model
6.7
