RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation vs GeForce 920A
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation and 2GB VRAM GeForce 920A to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation Advantages
Released 8 years late
Boost Clock2010MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (256.0GB/s vs 16.02GB/s)
2688 additional rendering cores
GeForce 920A Advantages
Lower TDP (33W vs 50W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation
+1584%
12350
GeForce 920A
733
Graphics Card
Mar 2023
Release Date
Mar 2015
Quadro Ada-M
Generation
GeForce 900A
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x8
Clock Speeds
1530 MHz
Base Clock
-
2010 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
1001 MHz
Memory
8GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
DDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
64bit
256.0GB/s
Bandwidth
16.02GB/s
Render Config
24
SM Count
-
3072
Shading Units
384
96
TMUs
32
48
ROPs
8
96
Tensor Cores
-
24
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
12 MB
L2 Cache
512 KB
Theoretical Performance
96.48 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
7.632 GPixel/s
193.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
30.53 GTexel/s
12.35 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
12.35 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
732.7 GFLOPS
193.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
30.53 GFLOPS
Board Design
50W
TDP
33W
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Processor
AD107
GPU Name
GK208B
-
GPU Variant
N16V-GM
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
Kepler 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
28 nm
18.9 billion
Transistors
1.02 billion
159 mm²
Die Size
87 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.1
8.9
CUDA
3.5
6.7
Shader Model
5.1
