Home Mobile and Tablet SoC Comparison RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation vs Radeon E4690 MXM

RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation vs Radeon E4690 MXM

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation and 512MB VRAM Radeon E4690 MXM to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation Advantages
Released 13 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock2010MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (256.0GB/s vs 22.40GB/s)
2752 additional rendering cores
Radeon E4690 MXM Advantages
Lower TDP (30W vs 50W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation +3116%
12350
Radeon E4690 MXM
384

Graphics Card

Mar 2023
Release Date
Jun 2009
Quadro Ada-M
Generation
Embedded
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-II

Clock Speeds

1530 MHz
Base Clock
-
2010 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
700 MHz

Memory

8GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
256.0GB/s
Bandwidth
22.40GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
4
24
SM Count
-
3072
Shading Units
320
96
TMUs
32
48
ROPs
8
96
Tensor Cores
-
24
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
12 MB
L2 Cache
128 KB

Theoretical Performance

96.48 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
4.800 GPixel/s
193.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
19.20 GTexel/s
12.35 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
12.35 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
384.0 GFLOPS
193.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

50W
TDP
30W
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Processor

AD107
GPU Name
RV730
-
GPU Variant
RV730 XT E4690


(215-0729055)
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
55 nm
18.9 billion
Transistors
0.514 billion
159 mm²
Die Size
146 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
10.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.9
CUDA
-
6.7
Shader Model
4.1
© 2025 - TopCPU.net