RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation vs GeForce GTX 485M
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation and 2GB VRAM GeForce GTX 485M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation Advantages
Released 12 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock2010MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (256.0GB/s vs 96.00GB/s)
2688 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (50W vs 100W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation
+1298%
12350
GeForce GTX 485M
883
Graphics Card
Mar 2023
Release Date
Jan 2011
Quadro Ada-M
Generation
GeForce 400M
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-B (3.0)
Clock Speeds
1530 MHz
Base Clock
-
2010 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
750 MHz
Memory
8GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
256.0GB/s
Bandwidth
96.00GB/s
Render Config
24
SM Count
8
3072
Shading Units
384
96
TMUs
64
48
ROPs
32
96
Tensor Cores
-
24
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
12 MB
L2 Cache
512 KB
Theoretical Performance
96.48 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
9.200 GPixel/s
193.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
36.80 GTexel/s
12.35 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
12.35 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
883.2 GFLOPS
193.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
73.60 GFLOPS
Board Design
50W
TDP
100W
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
AD107
GPU Name
GF104
-
GPU Variant
N12E-GTX-A1
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
Fermi
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
40 nm
18.9 billion
Transistors
1.95 billion
159 mm²
Die Size
332 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.9
CUDA
2.1
6.7
Shader Model
5.1
