RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation vs GeForce GTX 285M
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation and 1024MB VRAM GeForce GTX 285M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation Advantages
Released 13 years and 1 months late
Boost Clock2010MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (256.0GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
2944 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (50W vs 75W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation
+3116%
12350
GeForce GTX 285M
384
Graphics Card
Mar 2023
Release Date
Feb 2010
Quadro Ada-M
Generation
GeForce 200M
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-B (3.0)
Clock Speeds
1530 MHz
Base Clock
-
2010 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
1000 MHz
Memory
8GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
256.0GB/s
Bandwidth
64.00GB/s
Render Config
24
SM Count
16
3072
Shading Units
128
96
TMUs
64
48
ROPs
16
96
Tensor Cores
-
24
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
12 MB
L2 Cache
64 KB
Theoretical Performance
96.48 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
9.600 GPixel/s
193.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
38.40 GTexel/s
12.35 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
12.35 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
384.0 GFLOPS
193.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
50W
TDP
75W
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Processor
AD107
GPU Name
G92
-
GPU Variant
N10E-GTX1-B1
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
65 nm
18.9 billion
Transistors
0.754 billion
159 mm²
Die Size
324 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.9
CUDA
1.1
6.7
Shader Model
4.0
