Home
Mobile and Tablet SoC Comparison
RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation vs GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER Max Q
RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation vs GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER Max Q
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation and 8GB VRAM GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER Max Q to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation Advantages
Released 2 years and 11 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 74% (2010MHz vs 1155MHz)
512 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (50W vs 80W)
GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER Max Q Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (352.0GB/s vs 256.0GB/s)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation
+108%
12350
GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER Max Q
5914
Graphics Card
Mar 2023
Release Date
Apr 2020
Quadro Ada-M
Generation
GeForce 20 Mobile
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1530 MHz
Base Clock
930 MHz
2010 MHz
Boost Clock
1155 MHz
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
1375 MHz
Memory
8GB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
256.0GB/s
Bandwidth
352.0GB/s
Render Config
24
SM Count
40
3072
Shading Units
2560
96
TMUs
160
48
ROPs
64
96
Tensor Cores
320
24
RT Cores
40
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
12 MB
L2 Cache
4 MB
Theoretical Performance
96.48 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
73.92 GPixel/s
193.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
184.8 GTexel/s
12.35 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
11.83 TFLOPS
12.35 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
5.914 TFLOPS
193.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
184.8 GFLOPS
Board Design
50W
TDP
80W
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
AD107
GPU Name
TU104
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
12 nm
18.9 billion
Transistors
13.6 billion
159 mm²
Die Size
545 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
8.9
CUDA
7.5
6.7
Shader Model
6.6
