RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation vs FirePro W6150M
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation and 4GB VRAM FirePro W6150M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation Advantages
Released 7 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock2010MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (256.0GB/s vs 88.00GB/s)
2304 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation
+648%
12350
FirePro W6150M
1651
Graphics Card
Mar 2023
Release Date
Nov 2015
Quadro Ada-M
Generation
FirePro Mobile
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-B (3.0)
Clock Speeds
1530 MHz
Base Clock
-
2010 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
1375 MHz
Memory
8GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
256.0GB/s
Bandwidth
88.00GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
12
24
SM Count
-
3072
Shading Units
768
96
TMUs
48
48
ROPs
16
96
Tensor Cores
-
24
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
12 MB
L2 Cache
256 KB
Theoretical Performance
96.48 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
17.20 GPixel/s
193.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
51.60 GTexel/s
12.35 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
12.35 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1.651 TFLOPS
193.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
103.2 GFLOPS
Board Design
50W
TDP
Unknown
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
AD107
GPU Name
Emerald
-
GPU Variant
Emerald XT GL
(216-0857001)
(216-0857001)
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
GCN 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
28 nm
18.9 billion
Transistors
2.08 billion
159 mm²
Die Size
160 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
2.1
1.3
Vulkan
1.2.170
8.9
CUDA
-
6.7
Shader Model
6.5