Quadro K2000 vs Data Center GPU Max Subsystem
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 2GB VRAM Quadro K2000 and 128GB VRAM Data Center GPU Max Subsystem to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Quadro K2000 Advantages
Lower TDP (51W vs 2400W)
Data Center GPU Max Subsystem Advantages
Released 9 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock1600MHz
More VRAM (128GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (3205GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
16000 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro K2000
733
Data Center GPU Max Subsystem
+7052%
52430
Graphics Card
Mar 2013
Release Date
Jan 2023
Quadro
Generation
Data Center GPU
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 5.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
900 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1600 MHz
1000 MHz
Memory Clock
1565 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
128GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
HBM2e
128bit
Memory Bus
8192bit
64.00GB/s
Bandwidth
3205GB/s
Render Config
384
Shading Units
16384
32
TMUs
1024
16
ROPs
0
-
Tensor Cores
1024
-
RT Cores
128
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per EU)
256 KB
L2 Cache
408 MB
Theoretical Performance
7.632 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
0 MPixel/s
30.53 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
1638 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
52.43 TFLOPS
732.7 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
52.43 TFLOPS
30.53 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
52.43 TFLOPS
Board Design
51W
TDP
2400W
250 W
Suggested PSU
2800 W
1x DVI
2x DisplayPort 1.2
2x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
1x 16-pin
Graphics Processor
GK107
GPU Name
Ponte Vecchio
GK107-301-A2
GPU Variant
-
Kepler
Architecture
Generation 12.5
TSMC
Foundry
Intel
28 nm
Process Size
10 nm
1.27 billion
Transistors
100 billion
118 mm²
Die Size
1280 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.1
Vulkan
N/A
3.0
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
6.6
