Quadro 400 vs Quadro T1000 Mobile GDDR6
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 512MB VRAM Quadro 400 and 4GB VRAM Quadro T1000 Mobile GDDR6 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Quadro 400 Advantages
Lower TDP (32W vs 50W)
Quadro T1000 Mobile GDDR6 Advantages
Released 9 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock1650MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.0GB/s vs 12.32GB/s)
848 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro 400
108
Quadro T1000 Mobile GDDR6
+2637%
2957
Graphics Card
Apr 2011
Release Date
Jun 2020
Quadro
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1395 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1650 MHz
770 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz
Memory
512MB
Memory Size
4GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
64bit
Memory Bus
128bit
12.32GB/s
Bandwidth
192.0GB/s
Render Config
6
SM Count
14
48
Shading Units
896
16
TMUs
56
8
ROPs
32
-
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
32 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
Theoretical Performance
3.600 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
52.80 GPixel/s
7.200 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
92.40 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
5.914 TFLOPS
108.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.957 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
92.40 GFLOPS
Board Design
32W
TDP
50W
200 W
Suggested PSU
-
1x DVI
1x DisplayPort
1x DisplayPort
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GT216
GPU Name
TU117B
GT216 GL
GPU Variant
N19P-Q1-A1
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
12 nm
0.486 billion
Transistors
4.7 billion
100 mm²
Die Size
200 mm²
Graphics Features
11.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.2
CUDA
7.5
4.1
Shader Model
6.6
