NVIDIA TITAN Ada vs NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 48GB VRAM TITAN Ada and 16GB VRAM RTX 2000 Ada Generation to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA TITAN Ada 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 18% (2520MHz vs 2130MHz)
More VRAM (48GB vs 16GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1.15TB/s vs 256.0GB/s)
15616 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation 's Advantages
Lower TDP (70W vs 800W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
TITAN Ada
+674%
92.9 TFLOPS
RTX 2000 Ada Generation
12 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Unknown
Release Date
Feb 2024
GeForce 40
Generation
Quadro Ada
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8
Clock Speeds
2235 MHz
Base Clock
1620 MHz
2520 MHz
Boost Clock
2130 MHz
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz
Memory
48GB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR6X
Memory Type
GDDR6
384bit
Memory Bus
128bit
1.15TB/s
Bandwidth
256.0GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
144
SM Count
22
18432
Shading Units
2816
576
TMUs
88
192
ROPs
48
576
Tensor Cores
88
144
RT Cores
22
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
96 MB
L2 Cache
12 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
483.8 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
102.2 GPixel/s
1452 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
187.4 GTexel/s
92.90 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
12.00 TFLOPS
92.90 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
12.00 TFLOPS
1452 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
187.4 GFLOPS
Board Design
800W
TDP
70W
1200 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x HDMI 2.1
3x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
2x 16-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
AD102
GPU Name
AD107
AD102-450-A1
GPU Variant
-
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
5 nm
76.3 billion
Transistors
18.9 billion
609 mm²
Die Size
159 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
8.9
CUDA
8.9
6.8
Shader Model
6.7
