NVIDIA TITAN Ada vs ATI FirePro 2460 Multi View
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 48GB VRAM TITAN Ada and 512MB VRAM FirePro 2460 Multi View to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA TITAN Ada 's Advantages
Boost Clock2520MHz
More VRAM (48GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1.15TB/s vs 32.00GB/s)
18352 additional rendering cores
ATI FirePro 2460 Multi View 's Advantages
Lower TDP (17W vs 800W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
TITAN Ada
+116025%
92.9 TFLOPS
FirePro 2460 Multi View
0.08 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Unknown
Release Date
Apr 2010
GeForce 40
Generation
FirePro Multi-View
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
2235 MHz
Base Clock
-
2520 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
500 MHz
Memory
48GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR6X
Memory Type
DDR3
384bit
Memory Bus
256bit
1.15TB/s
Bandwidth
32.00GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
1
144
SM Count
-
18432
Shading Units
80
576
TMUs
8
192
ROPs
4
576
Tensor Cores
-
144
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
96 MB
L2 Cache
-
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
483.8 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.000 GPixel/s
1452 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
4.000 GTexel/s
92.90 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
92.90 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
80.00 GFLOPS
1452 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
800W
TDP
17W
1200 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x HDMI 2.1
3x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.1
2x 16-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
AD102
GPU Name
Cedar
AD102-450-A1
GPU Variant
Cedar GL
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
TeraScale 2
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
40 nm
76.3 billion
Transistors
0.292 billion
609 mm²
Die Size
59 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.4
3.0
OpenCL
1.2
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.9
CUDA
-
6.8
Shader Model
5.0
