Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Tesla S2050 vs NVIDIA RTX A2000

NVIDIA Tesla S2050 vs NVIDIA RTX A2000

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 3GB VRAM Tesla S2050 and 6GB VRAM RTX A2000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA RTX A2000 's Advantages
Released 10 years and 1 months late
Boost Clock1200MHz
More VRAM (6GB vs 3GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (288.0GB/s vs 148.4GB/s)
2880 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (70W vs 900W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Tesla S2050
1.028 TFLOPS
RTX A2000 +676%
7.987 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jul 2011
Release Date
Aug 2021
Tesla
Generation
Quadro Ampere
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
562 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1200 MHz
773 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz

Memory

3GB
Memory Size
6GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
384bit
Memory Bus
192bit
148.4GB/s
Bandwidth
288.0GB/s

Render Config

14
SM Count
26
-
Compute Units
-
448
Shading Units
3328
56
TMUs
104
48
ROPs
48
-
Tensor Cores
104
-
RT Cores
26
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
768 KB
L2 Cache
3 MB

Theoretical Performance

16.07 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
57.60 GPixel/s
32.14 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
124.8 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
7.987 TFLOPS
1028 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
7.987 TFLOPS
513.9 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
124.8 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GF100
GPU Name
GA106
-
GPU Variant
GA106-850-A1
Fermi
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
40 nm
Process Size
8 nm
3.1 billion
Transistors
12 billion
529 mm²
Die Size
276 mm²

Board Design

900W
TDP
70W
1300 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
No outputs
Outputs
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
-
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
2.0
CUDA
8.6
5.1
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy