Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Tesla M2090 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700

NVIDIA Tesla M2090 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 6GB VRAM Tesla M2090 and 512MB VRAM Quadro FX 1700 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Tesla M2090 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 10 months late
Larger VRAM bandwidth (177.4GB/s vs 25.60GB/s)
480 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700 's Advantages
Lower TDP (42W vs 250W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Tesla M2090 +2157%
1.332 TFLOPS
Quadro FX 1700
0.059 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jul 2011
Release Date
Sep 2007
Tesla
Generation
Quadro FX
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
924 MHz
Memory Clock
400 MHz

Memory

6GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
DDR2
384bit
Memory Bus
256bit
177.4GB/s
Bandwidth
25.60GB/s

Render Config

16
SM Count
4
-
Compute Units
-
512
Shading Units
32
64
TMUs
16
48
ROPs
8
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
768 KB
L2 Cache
64 KB

Theoretical Performance

20.83 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
3.680 GPixel/s
41.66 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
7.360 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
1332 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
58.88 GFLOPS
666.1 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Graphics Processor

GF110
GPU Name
G84
-
GPU Variant
G84-875-A2
Fermi 2.0
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
80 nm
3 billion
Transistors
0.289 billion
520 mm²
Die Size
169 mm²

Board Design

250W
TDP
42W
600 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
No outputs
Outputs
2x DVI 1x S-Video
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
1.1
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
2.0
CUDA
1.1
5.1
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy