Home GPU Comparison Intel Arctic Sound M vs NVIDIA Tesla M2090

Intel Arctic Sound M vs NVIDIA Tesla M2090

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 16GB VRAM Intel Arctic Sound M and 6GB VRAM Tesla M2090 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Intel Arctic Sound M 's Advantages
Released 10 years and 6 months late
More VRAM (16GB vs 6GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1229GB/s vs 177.4GB/s)
7680 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Tesla M2090 's Advantages
Lower TDP (250W vs 500W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Intel Arctic Sound M +1007%
14.75 TFLOPS
Tesla M2090
1.332 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2022
Release Date
Jul 2011
Xe Graphics
Generation
Tesla
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
1200 MHz
Memory Clock
924 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
6GB
HBM2e
Memory Type
GDDR5
4096bit
Memory Bus
384bit
1229GB/s
Bandwidth
177.4GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
16
-
Compute Units
-
8192
Shading Units
512
256
TMUs
64
128
ROPs
48
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
8 MB
L2 Cache
768 KB

Theoretical Performance

115.2 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
20.83 GPixel/s
230.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
41.66 GTexel/s
29.49 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
14.75 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1332 GFLOPS
3.686 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
666.1 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

DG2-512
GPU Name
GF110
-
GPU Variant
-
Generation 12.7
Architecture
Fermi 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
6 nm
Process Size
40 nm
21.7 billion
Transistors
3 billion
406 mm²
Die Size
520 mm²

Board Design

500W
TDP
250W
900 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
8-pin EPS
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
2.0
6.6
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy