NVIDIA Tesla K20Xm vs NVIDIA RTX A2000 Embedded
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 6GB VRAM Tesla K20Xm and 8GB VRAM RTX A2000 Embedded to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Tesla K20Xm 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (249.6GB/s vs 192.0GB/s)
128 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA RTX A2000 Embedded 's Advantages
Boost Clock1612MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 6GB)
Lower TDP (60W vs 235W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Tesla K20Xm
3.935 TFLOPS
RTX A2000 Embedded
+109%
8.253 TFLOPS
Blender
Tesla K20Xm
372
RTX A2000 Embedded
+437%
2001
OctaneBench
Tesla K20Xm
63
RTX A2000 Embedded
+330%
271
Graphics Card
Nov 2012
Release Date
Unknown
Tesla
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1117 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1612 MHz
1300 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz
Memory
6GB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
384bit
Memory Bus
128bit
249.6GB/s
Bandwidth
192.0GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
SM Count
20
2688
Shading Units
2560
224
TMUs
80
48
ROPs
48
-
Tensor Cores
80
-
RT Cores
20
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
1536 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
40.99 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
77.38 GPixel/s
164.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
129.0 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
8.253 TFLOPS
3.935 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
8.253 TFLOPS
1312 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
129.0 GFLOPS
Board Design
235W
TDP
60W
550 W
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GK110
GPU Name
GA107S
-
-
-
Kepler
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
28 nm
Process Size
8 nm
7.08 billion
Transistors
Unknown
561 mm²
Die Size
Unknown
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.1
Vulkan
1.3
3.5
CUDA
8.6
5.1
Shader Model
6.6
