NVIDIA Tesla C2090 vs NVIDIA Quadro 5000M
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 6GB VRAM Tesla C2090 and 1792MB VRAM Quadro 5000M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Tesla C2090 's Advantages
Released 1 years late
More VRAM (6GB vs 1792GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (177.4GB/s vs 76.80GB/s)
192 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro 5000M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (100W vs 250W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Tesla C2090
+157%
1.332 TFLOPS
Quadro 5000M
0.518 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jul 2011
Release Date
Jul 2010
Tesla
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-B (3.0)
Clock Speeds
-
-
-
-
-
-
924 MHz
Memory Clock
600 MHz
Memory
6GB
Memory Size
1792MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
384bit
Memory Bus
256bit
177.4GB/s
Bandwidth
76.80GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
16
SM Count
10
512
Shading Units
320
64
TMUs
40
48
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
768 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
20.83 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
8.100 GPixel/s
41.66 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
16.20 GTexel/s
-
-
-
1332 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
518.4 GFLOPS
666.1 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
250W
TDP
100W
600 W
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
-
-
Graphics Processor
GF110
GPU Name
GF100
-
GPU Variant
N10E-GLM5-A3
Fermi 2.0
Architecture
Fermi
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
40 nm
3 billion
Transistors
3.1 billion
520 mm²
Die Size
529 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
2.0
CUDA
2.0
5.1
Shader Model
5.1
