NVIDIA Tesla C2090 vs NVIDIA Quadro 5010M
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 6GB VRAM Tesla C2090 and 4GB VRAM Quadro 5010M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Tesla C2090 's Advantages
More VRAM (6GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (177.4GB/s vs 83.20GB/s)
128 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro 5010M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (100W vs 250W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Tesla C2090
+92%
1.332 TFLOPS
Quadro 5010M
0.691 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jul 2011
Release Date
Feb 2011
Tesla
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-B (3.0)
Clock Speeds
-
-
-
-
-
-
924 MHz
Memory Clock
650 MHz
Memory
6GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
384bit
Memory Bus
256bit
177.4GB/s
Bandwidth
83.20GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
16
SM Count
12
512
Shading Units
384
64
TMUs
48
48
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
768 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
20.83 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
10.80 GPixel/s
41.66 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
21.60 GTexel/s
-
-
-
1332 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
691.2 GFLOPS
666.1 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
250W
TDP
100W
600 W
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
-
-
Graphics Processor
GF110
GPU Name
GF110
-
GPU Variant
N12E-Q5
Fermi 2.0
Architecture
Fermi 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
40 nm
3 billion
Transistors
3 billion
520 mm²
Die Size
520 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
2.0
CUDA
2.0
5.1
Shader Model
5.1
