NVIDIA Tesla C2090 vs NVIDIA A10M
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 6GB VRAM Tesla C2090 and 24GB VRAM A10M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA A10M 's Advantages
Released 10 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock1635MHz
More VRAM (24GB vs 6GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (600.2GB/s vs 177.4GB/s)
6656 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (150W vs 250W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Tesla C2090
1.332 TFLOPS
A10M
+1659%
23.44 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jul 2011
Release Date
Feb 2022
Tesla
Generation
Tesla Ampere
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
975 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1635 MHz
924 MHz
Memory Clock
1563 MHz
Memory
6GB
Memory Size
24GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
384bit
Memory Bus
384bit
177.4GB/s
Bandwidth
600.2GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
16
SM Count
56
512
Shading Units
7168
64
TMUs
224
48
ROPs
80
-
Tensor Cores
224
-
RT Cores
56
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
768 KB
L2 Cache
6 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
20.83 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
130.8 GPixel/s
41.66 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
366.2 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
23.44 TFLOPS
1332 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
23.44 TFLOPS
666.1 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
732.5 GFLOPS
Board Design
250W
TDP
150W
600 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
8-pin EPS
Graphics Processor
GF110
GPU Name
GA102
-
-
-
Fermi 2.0
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
40 nm
Process Size
8 nm
3 billion
Transistors
28.3 billion
520 mm²
Die Size
628 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
2.0
CUDA
8.6
5.1
Shader Model
6.7
