NVIDIA Tesla C2050 vs NVIDIA GRID RTX T10 16
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 3GB VRAM Tesla C2050 and 16GB VRAM GRID RTX T10 16 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GRID RTX T10 16 's Advantages
Boost Clock1395MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 3GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (604.8GB/s vs 144.0GB/s)
3136 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (150W vs 238W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Tesla C2050
1.028 TFLOPS
GRID RTX T10 16
+872%
9.999 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jul 2011
Release Date
Unknown
Tesla
Generation
GRID
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1065 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1395 MHz
750 MHz
Memory Clock
1575 MHz
Memory
3GB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
384bit
Memory Bus
384bit
144.0GB/s
Bandwidth
604.8GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
14
SM Count
56
448
Shading Units
3584
56
TMUs
224
48
ROPs
64
-
Tensor Cores
448
-
RT Cores
56
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
768 KB
L2 Cache
6 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
16.07 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
89.28 GPixel/s
32.14 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
312.5 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
20.00 TFLOPS
1028 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
9.999 TFLOPS
513.9 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
312.5 GFLOPS
Board Design
238W
TDP
150W
550 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x DVI
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
GF100
GPU Name
TU102
GF100-850-A3
GPU Variant
TU102-875-A1
Fermi
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
12 nm
3.1 billion
Transistors
18.6 billion
529 mm²
Die Size
754 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
2.0
CUDA
7.5
5.1
Shader Model
6.8
