NVIDIA Tesla C2050 vs NVIDIA Quadro M5000M
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 3GB VRAM Tesla C2050 and 8GB VRAM Quadro M5000M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro M5000M 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 1 months late
More VRAM (8GB vs 3GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (160.4GB/s vs 144.0GB/s)
1088 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (100W vs 238W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Tesla C2050
1.028 TFLOPS
Quadro M5000M
+191%
2.995 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jul 2011
Release Date
Aug 2015
Tesla
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-B (3.0)
Clock Speeds
-
-
-
-
-
-
750 MHz
Memory Clock
1253 MHz
Memory
3GB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
384bit
Memory Bus
256bit
144.0GB/s
Bandwidth
160.4GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
14
SM Count
-
448
Shading Units
1536
56
TMUs
96
48
ROPs
64
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SMM)
768 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
16.07 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
62.40 GPixel/s
32.14 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
93.60 GTexel/s
-
-
-
1028 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.995 TFLOPS
513.9 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
93.60 GFLOPS
Board Design
238W
TDP
100W
550 W
Suggested PSU
-
1x DVI
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GF100
GPU Name
GM204
GF100-850-A3
GPU Variant
N16E-Q5-A1
Fermi
Architecture
Maxwell 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
28 nm
3.1 billion
Transistors
5.2 billion
529 mm²
Die Size
398 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
2.0
CUDA
5.2
5.1
Shader Model
6.4
