NVIDIA RTX A6000 vs NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000 Mobile
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 48GB VRAM RTX A6000 and 24GB VRAM Quadro RTX 6000 Mobile to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA RTX A6000 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 1 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 24% (1800MHz vs 1455MHz)
More VRAM (48GB vs 24GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (768.0GB/s vs 672.0GB/s)
6144 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
RTX A6000
+188%
38.71 TFLOPS
Quadro RTX 6000 Mobile
13.41 TFLOPS
Blender
RTX A6000
+83%
5387
Quadro RTX 6000 Mobile
2937
OctaneBench
RTX A6000
+69%
600
Quadro RTX 6000 Mobile
355
Graphics Card
Oct 2020
Release Date
Sep 2019
Quadro Ampere
Generation
Quadro Turing-M
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1410 MHz
Base Clock
1275 MHz
1800 MHz
Boost Clock
1455 MHz
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz
Memory
48GB
Memory Size
24GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR6
384bit
Memory Bus
384bit
768.0GB/s
Bandwidth
672.0GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
84
SM Count
72
10752
Shading Units
4608
336
TMUs
288
112
ROPs
96
336
Tensor Cores
576
84
RT Cores
72
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
6 MB
L2 Cache
6 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
201.6 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
139.7 GPixel/s
604.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
419.0 GTexel/s
38.71 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
26.82 TFLOPS
38.71 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
13.41 TFLOPS
604.8 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
419.0 GFLOPS
Board Design
300W
TDP
Unknown
700 W
Suggested PSU
-
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
8-pin EPS
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GA102
GPU Name
TU102
-
-
-
Ampere
Architecture
Turing
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
8 nm
Process Size
12 nm
28.3 billion
Transistors
18.6 billion
628 mm²
Die Size
754 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
8.6
CUDA
7.5
6.7
Shader Model
6.7
