NVIDIA RTX A6000 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 3600M
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 48GB VRAM RTX A6000 and 512MB VRAM Quadro FX 3600M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA RTX A6000 's Advantages
Released 12 years and 8 months late
Boost Clock1800MHz
More VRAM (48GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (768.0GB/s vs 51.14GB/s)
10688 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro FX 3600M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (70W vs 300W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
RTX A6000
+24093%
38.71 TFLOPS
Quadro FX 3600M
0.16 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Oct 2020
Release Date
Feb 2008
Quadro Ampere
Generation
Quadro FX Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-HE
Clock Speeds
1410 MHz
Base Clock
-
1800 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
799 MHz
Memory
48GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR3
384bit
Memory Bus
256bit
768.0GB/s
Bandwidth
51.14GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
84
SM Count
8
10752
Shading Units
64
336
TMUs
32
112
ROPs
16
336
Tensor Cores
-
84
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
6 MB
L2 Cache
64 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
201.6 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
8.000 GPixel/s
604.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
16.00 GTexel/s
38.71 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
38.71 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
160.0 GFLOPS
604.8 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
300W
TDP
70W
700 W
Suggested PSU
-
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
No outputs
8-pin EPS
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Processor
GA102
GPU Name
G92
-
GPU Variant
NB8E-GLM3
Ampere
Architecture
Tesla
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
8 nm
Process Size
65 nm
28.3 billion
Transistors
0.754 billion
628 mm²
Die Size
324 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.6
CUDA
1.1
6.7
Shader Model
4.0
