NVIDIA RTX A6000 vs NVIDIA Quadro M5000M
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 48GB VRAM RTX A6000 and 8GB VRAM Quadro M5000M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA RTX A6000 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock1800MHz
More VRAM (48GB vs 8GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (768.0GB/s vs 160.4GB/s)
9216 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro M5000M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (100W vs 300W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
RTX A6000
+1192%
38.71 TFLOPS
Quadro M5000M
2.995 TFLOPS
3DMark Time Spy
RTX A6000
+531%
17742
Quadro M5000M
2810
3DMark Time Spy Extreme
RTX A6000
+610%
9324
Quadro M5000M
1312
Blender
RTX A6000
+1858%
5387
Quadro M5000M
275
OctaneBench
RTX A6000
+883%
600
Quadro M5000M
61
Graphics Card
Oct 2020
Release Date
Aug 2015
Quadro Ampere
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-B (3.0)
Clock Speeds
1410 MHz
Base Clock
-
1800 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
1253 MHz
Memory
48GB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
384bit
Memory Bus
256bit
768.0GB/s
Bandwidth
160.4GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
84
SM Count
-
10752
Shading Units
1536
336
TMUs
96
112
ROPs
64
336
Tensor Cores
-
84
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SMM)
6 MB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
201.6 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
62.40 GPixel/s
604.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
93.60 GTexel/s
38.71 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
38.71 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.995 TFLOPS
604.8 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
93.60 GFLOPS
Board Design
300W
TDP
100W
700 W
Suggested PSU
-
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
No outputs
8-pin EPS
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GA102
GPU Name
GM204
-
GPU Variant
N16E-Q5-A1
Ampere
Architecture
Maxwell 2.0
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
8 nm
Process Size
28 nm
28.3 billion
Transistors
5.2 billion
628 mm²
Die Size
398 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
8.6
CUDA
5.2
6.7
Shader Model
6.4
