Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA RTX A5500 Max-Q vs Intel Data Center GPU Flex 170

NVIDIA RTX A5500 Max-Q vs Intel Data Center GPU Flex 170

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 16GB VRAM RTX A5500 Max Q and 16GB VRAM Data Center GPU Flex 170 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA RTX A5500 Max-Q 's Advantages
3328 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (80W vs 150W)
Intel Data Center GPU Flex 170 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 63% (2050MHz vs 1260MHz)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 448.0GB/s)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
RTX A5500 Max Q +11%
18.71 TFLOPS
Data Center GPU Flex 170
16.79 TFLOPS

Graphics Card

Mar 2022
Release Date
Aug 2022
Ampere-MW
Generation
Data Center GPU
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

585 MHz
Base Clock
1950 MHz
1260 MHz
Boost Clock
2050 MHz
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
448.0GB/s
Bandwidth
512.0GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
58
SM Count
-
7424
Shading Units
4096
232
TMUs
256
96
ROPs
128
232
Tensor Cores
-
58
RT Cores
32
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
4 MB
L2 Cache
16 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

121.0 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
262.4 GPixel/s
292.3 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
524.8 GTexel/s
18.71 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
33.59 TFLOPS
18.71 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
16.79 TFLOPS
292.3 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

80W
TDP
150W
-
Suggested PSU
450 W
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.1 3x DisplayPort 2.0
None
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

GA103
GPU Name
DG2-512
-
GPU Variant
ACM-G10
Ampere
Architecture
Generation 12.7
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
8 nm
Process Size
6 nm
22 billion
Transistors
21.7 billion
496 mm²
Die Size
406 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
8.6
CUDA
-
6.8
Shader Model
6.6
© 2025 - TopCPU.net