NVIDIA RTX A5500 Max-Q vs NVIDIA Tesla C2050
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 16GB VRAM RTX A5500 Max Q and 3GB VRAM Tesla C2050 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA RTX A5500 Max-Q 's Advantages
Released 10 years and 8 months late
Boost Clock1260MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 3GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (448.0GB/s vs 144.0GB/s)
6976 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (80W vs 238W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
RTX A5500 Max Q
+1720%
18.71 TFLOPS
Tesla C2050
1.028 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Mar 2022
Release Date
Jul 2011
Ampere-MW
Generation
Tesla
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
585 MHz
Base Clock
-
1260 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
750 MHz
Memory
16GB
Memory Size
3GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
384bit
448.0GB/s
Bandwidth
144.0GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
58
SM Count
14
7424
Shading Units
448
232
TMUs
56
96
ROPs
48
232
Tensor Cores
-
58
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
4 MB
L2 Cache
768 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
121.0 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
16.07 GPixel/s
292.3 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
32.14 GTexel/s
18.71 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
18.71 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1028 GFLOPS
292.3 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
513.9 GFLOPS
Board Design
80W
TDP
238W
-
Suggested PSU
550 W
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
1x DVI
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
GA103
GPU Name
GF100
-
GPU Variant
GF100-850-A3
Ampere
Architecture
Fermi
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
8 nm
Process Size
40 nm
22 billion
Transistors
3.1 billion
496 mm²
Die Size
529 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.6
CUDA
2.0
6.8
Shader Model
5.1
