NVIDIA RTX A500 Embedded vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 3800
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM RTX A500 Embedded and 1024MB VRAM Quadro FX 3800 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA RTX A500 Embedded 's Advantages
Released 13 years late
Boost Clock1335MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (96.00GB/s vs 51.20GB/s)
1856 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (20W vs 108W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
RTX A500 Embedded
+1083%
5.468 TFLOPS
Quadro FX 3800
0.462 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Mar 2022
Release Date
Mar 2009
Quadro Ampere-M
Generation
Quadro FX
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
435 MHz
Base Clock
-
1335 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR3
64bit
Memory Bus
256bit
96.00GB/s
Bandwidth
51.20GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
16
SM Count
24
2048
Shading Units
192
64
TMUs
64
32
ROPs
16
64
Tensor Cores
-
16
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
2 MB
L2 Cache
128 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
42.72 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
9.600 GPixel/s
85.44 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
38.40 GTexel/s
5.468 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
5.468 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
462.3 GFLOPS
85.44 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
57.79 GFLOPS
Board Design
20W
TDP
108W
-
Suggested PSU
300 W
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
1x DVI
2x DisplayPort
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
GA107S
GPU Name
GT200B
-
GPU Variant
G200-835-B2
Ampere
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
8 nm
Process Size
55 nm
8.7 billion
Transistors
1.4 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
470 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.6
CUDA
1.3
6.7
Shader Model
4.0
