NVIDIA RTX A500 Embedded vs NVIDIA Quadro NVS 295
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM RTX A500 Embedded and 256MB VRAM Quadro NVS 295 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA RTX A500 Embedded 's Advantages
Released 12 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock1335MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (96.00GB/s vs 11.12GB/s)
2040 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (20W vs 23W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
RTX A500 Embedded
+25938%
5.468 TFLOPS
Quadro NVS 295
0.021 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Mar 2022
Release Date
May 2009
Quadro Ampere-M
Generation
Quadro NVS
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16
Clock Speeds
435 MHz
Base Clock
-
1335 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
695 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
256MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR3
64bit
Memory Bus
64bit
96.00GB/s
Bandwidth
11.12GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
16
SM Count
1
2048
Shading Units
8
64
TMUs
4
32
ROPs
4
64
Tensor Cores
-
16
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
2 MB
L2 Cache
16 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
42.72 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.160 GPixel/s
85.44 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
2.160 GTexel/s
5.468 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
5.468 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
20.80 GFLOPS
85.44 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
20W
TDP
23W
-
Suggested PSU
200 W
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
2x DisplayPort
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GA107S
GPU Name
G98
-
-
-
Ampere
Architecture
Tesla
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
8 nm
Process Size
65 nm
8.7 billion
Transistors
0.21 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
86 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.6
CUDA
1.1
6.7
Shader Model
4.0
