Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA RTX A400 vs Moore Threads MTT S1000M

NVIDIA RTX A400 vs Moore Threads MTT S1000M

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM RTX A400 and 4GB VRAM Moore Threads MTT S1000M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA RTX A400 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock1762MHz
Moore Threads MTT S1000M 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (224.0GB/s vs 96.00GB/s)
256 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (35W vs 50W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
RTX A400 +32%
2.706 TFLOPS
Moore Threads MTT S1000M
2.048 TFLOPS

Graphics Card

Apr 2024
Release Date
Jul 2022
Quadro Ampere(Ax000)
Generation
MUSA-Chunxiao
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8

Clock Speeds

1417 MHz
Base Clock
1000 MHz
1762 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR6
64bit
Memory Bus
128bit
96.00GB/s
Bandwidth
224.0GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
8
6
SM Count
-
768
Shading Units
1024
24
TMUs
64
16
ROPs
64
24
Tensor Cores
-
6
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
2 MB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

28.19 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
64.00 GPixel/s
42.29 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
64.00 GTexel/s
2.706 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
4.096 TFLOPS
2.706 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.048 TFLOPS
42.29 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
32.00 GFLOPS

Board Design

50W
TDP
35W
250 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
2x DisplayPort 1.2
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GA107
GPU Name
MTT Gen 1
-
-
-
Ampere
Architecture
MUSA-Chunxiao
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
8 nm
Process Size
12 nm
8.7 billion
Transistors
Unknown
200 mm²
Die Size
Unknown

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.4
8.6
CUDA
-
6.8
Shader Model
6.5
© 2025 - TopCPU.net