NVIDIA RTX A400 vs AMD FireStream 9250
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM RTX A400 and 1024MB VRAM FireStream 9250 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA RTX A400 's Advantages
Released 15 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock1762MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (96.00GB/s vs 63.55GB/s)
Lower TDP (50W vs 150W)
AMD FireStream 9250 's Advantages
32 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
RTX A400
+170%
2.706 TFLOPS
FireStream 9250
1 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Apr 2024
Release Date
Jun 2008
Quadro Ampere(Ax000)
Generation
FireStream
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1417 MHz
Base Clock
-
1762 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
993 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR3
64bit
Memory Bus
256bit
96.00GB/s
Bandwidth
63.55GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
10
6
SM Count
-
768
Shading Units
800
24
TMUs
40
16
ROPs
16
24
Tensor Cores
-
6
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
2 MB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
28.19 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
10.00 GPixel/s
42.29 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
25.00 GTexel/s
2.706 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
2.706 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1000 GFLOPS
42.29 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
200.0 GFLOPS
Board Design
50W
TDP
150W
250 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x DVI
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
GA107
GPU Name
RV770
-
GPU Variant
RV770 PRO
Ampere
Architecture
TeraScale
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
8 nm
Process Size
55 nm
8.7 billion
Transistors
0.956 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
256 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
10.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.6
CUDA
-
6.8
Shader Model
4.1
