NVIDIA RTX A400 vs ATI FireMV 2260
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM RTX A400 and 256MB VRAM FireMV 2260 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA RTX A400 's Advantages
Released 16 years and 3 months late
Boost Clock1762MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (96.00GB/s vs 8.000GB/s)
728 additional rendering cores
ATI FireMV 2260 's Advantages
Lower TDP (15W vs 50W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
RTX A400
+6665%
2.706 TFLOPS
FireMV 2260
0.04 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Apr 2024
Release Date
Jan 2008
Quadro Ampere(Ax000)
Generation
FireMV Multi-View
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1417 MHz
Base Clock
-
1762 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
500 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
256MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
DDR2
64bit
Memory Bus
64bit
96.00GB/s
Bandwidth
8.000GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
2
6
SM Count
-
768
Shading Units
40
24
TMUs
4
16
ROPs
4
24
Tensor Cores
-
6
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
2 MB
L2 Cache
-
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
28.19 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.000 GPixel/s
42.29 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
2.000 GTexel/s
2.706 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
2.706 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
40.00 GFLOPS
42.29 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
50W
TDP
15W
250 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
4x mini-DisplayPort
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GA107
GPU Name
RV620
-
-
-
Ampere
Architecture
TeraScale
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
8 nm
Process Size
55 nm
8.7 billion
Transistors
0.181 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
67 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
10.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
N/A
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.6
CUDA
-
6.8
Shader Model
4.1
