NVIDIA RTX A400 vs NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GS Mac Edition
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM RTX A400 and 512MB VRAM GeForce 8800 GS Mac Edition to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA RTX A400 's Advantages
Released 16 years and 3 months late
Boost Clock1762MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (96.00GB/s vs 51.14GB/s)
704 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (50W vs 105W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
RTX A400
+1591%
2.706 TFLOPS
GeForce 8800 GS Mac Edition
0.16 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Apr 2024
Release Date
Jan 2008
Quadro Ampere(Ax000)
Generation
GeForce 8
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
MXM-HE
Clock Speeds
1417 MHz
Base Clock
-
1762 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
799 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR3
64bit
Memory Bus
256bit
96.00GB/s
Bandwidth
51.14GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
6
SM Count
8
768
Shading Units
64
24
TMUs
32
16
ROPs
16
24
Tensor Cores
-
6
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
2 MB
L2 Cache
64 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
28.19 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
8.000 GPixel/s
42.29 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
16.00 GTexel/s
2.706 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
2.706 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
160.0 GFLOPS
42.29 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
50W
TDP
105W
250 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GA107
GPU Name
G92
-
-
-
Ampere
Architecture
Tesla
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
8 nm
Process Size
65 nm
8.7 billion
Transistors
0.754 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
324 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.6
CUDA
1.1
6.8
Shader Model
4.0
