NVIDIA RTX A2000 vs Intel Data Center GPU Flex 170
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 6GB VRAM RTX A2000 and 16GB VRAM Data Center GPU Flex 170 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA RTX A2000 's Advantages
Lower TDP (70W vs 150W)
Intel Data Center GPU Flex 170 's Advantages
Released 1 years late
Boost Clock has increased by 71% (2050MHz vs 1200MHz)
More VRAM (16GB vs 6GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 288.0GB/s)
768 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
RTX A2000
7.987 TFLOPS
Data Center GPU Flex 170
+110%
16.79 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Aug 2021
Release Date
Aug 2022
Quadro Ampere
Generation
Data Center GPU
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
562 MHz
Base Clock
1950 MHz
1200 MHz
Boost Clock
2050 MHz
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz
Memory
6GB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR6
192bit
Memory Bus
256bit
288.0GB/s
Bandwidth
512.0GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
26
SM Count
-
3328
Shading Units
4096
104
TMUs
256
48
ROPs
128
104
Tensor Cores
-
26
RT Cores
32
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
3 MB
L2 Cache
16 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
57.60 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
262.4 GPixel/s
124.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
524.8 GTexel/s
7.987 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
33.59 TFLOPS
7.987 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
16.79 TFLOPS
124.8 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
70W
TDP
150W
250 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.1
3x DisplayPort 2.0
None
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
GA106
GPU Name
DG2-512
GA106-850-A1
GPU Variant
ACM-G10
Ampere
Architecture
Generation 12.7
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
8 nm
Process Size
6 nm
12 billion
Transistors
21.7 billion
276 mm²
Die Size
406 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
8.6
CUDA
-
6.7
Shader Model
6.6
