Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA RTX A2000 vs NVIDIA Quadro M2000M

NVIDIA RTX A2000 vs NVIDIA Quadro M2000M

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 6GB VRAM RTX A2000 and 4GB VRAM Quadro M2000M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA RTX A2000 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 8 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 9% (1200MHz vs 1098MHz)
More VRAM (6GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (288.0GB/s vs 80.19GB/s)
2688 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro M2000M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (55W vs 70W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
RTX A2000 +468%
7.987 TFLOPS
Quadro M2000M
1.405 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2021
Release Date
Dec 2015
Quadro Ampere
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-A (3.0)

Clock Speeds

562 MHz
Base Clock
1029 MHz
1200 MHz
Boost Clock
1098 MHz
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
1253 MHz

Memory

6GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
192bit
Memory Bus
128bit
288.0GB/s
Bandwidth
80.19GB/s

Render Config

26
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
-
3328
Shading Units
640
104
TMUs
40
48
ROPs
16
104
Tensor Cores
-
26
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SMM)
3 MB
L2 Cache
2 MB

Theoretical Performance

57.60 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
17.57 GPixel/s
124.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
43.92 GTexel/s
7.987 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
7.987 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1405 GFLOPS
124.8 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
43.92 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GA106
GPU Name
GM107
GA106-850-A1
GPU Variant
N16P-Q3-A2
Ampere
Architecture
Maxwell
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
8 nm
Process Size
28 nm
12 billion
Transistors
1.87 billion
276 mm²
Die Size
148 mm²

Board Design

70W
TDP
55W
250 W
Suggested PSU
-
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
8.6
CUDA
5.0
6.7
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy