NVIDIA RTX A2000 Mobile vs NVIDIA Quadro 3000M
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM RTX A2000 Mobile and 2GB VRAM Quadro 3000M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA RTX A2000 Mobile 's Advantages
Released 10 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock1687MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.0GB/s vs 80.00GB/s)
2320 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro 3000M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (75W vs 95W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
RTX A2000 Mobile
+1899%
8.637 TFLOPS
Quadro 3000M
0.432 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Apr 2021
Release Date
Feb 2011
Ampere-MW
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-B (3.0)
Clock Speeds
1215 MHz
Base Clock
-
1687 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
625 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
192.0GB/s
Bandwidth
80.00GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
20
SM Count
5
2560
Shading Units
240
80
TMUs
40
48
ROPs
32
80
Tensor Cores
-
20
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
2 MB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
80.98 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
4.500 GPixel/s
135.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
18.00 GTexel/s
8.637 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
8.637 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
432.0 GFLOPS
135.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
36.00 GFLOPS
Board Design
95W
TDP
75W
-
-
-
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Processor
GA107
GPU Name
GF104
-
GPU Variant
N12E-Q1-A1
Ampere
Architecture
Fermi
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
8 nm
Process Size
40 nm
8.7 billion
Transistors
1.95 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
332 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.6
CUDA
2.1
6.8
Shader Model
5.1
